As far as I remember, this page was related to Vanetsyan. Now he is trying to save Russia’s face on the Ukrainian front and present an American plan (which is “no man’s land” for both sides) as a win-lose outcome in favor of Putin, what is wrong. He praises Putin’s “determination to hold on to Donbass,” but forgets that Vanetsyan “did everything possible to hold on to Donbass” in 2020. On November 10, he proposed to transfer the whole of Artsakh, as well as its protected part to Azerbaijan. They forget that the protection of Shoushi was handed over to Artur Vanetsyan and Seyran Ohanyan, and the first of them left the front entrusted to him, the second came to Yerevan at a fateful moment for Shoushi to attend a memorial service…
But can they present the failure of Putin’s strategy as a victory?..
As far as I remember, this page was related to Vanetsyan. Now he is trying to save Russia’s face on the Ukrainian front and present an American plan (which is “no man’s land” for both sides) as a win-lose outcome in favor of Putin, what is wrong. Praises Putin’s “determination to hold on to Donbass,” but forgets that Vanetsyan “did everything possible to hold on to Donbass” in 2020. On November 10, he proposed to transfer the whole of Artsakh, as well as its protected part to Azerbaijan. They forget that the protection of Shoushi was handed over to Artur Vanetsyan and Seyran Ohanyan, and the first of them left the front entrusted to him, the second came to Yerevan at a fateful moment for Shoushi to attend a memorial service…
But can they present the failure of Putin’s strategy as a victory?..
As far as I remember, this page was related to Vanetsyan. Now he is trying to save Russia’s face on the Ukrainian front and present an American plan (which is “no man’s land” for both sides) as a win-lose outcome in favor of Putin, what is wrong. He praises Putin’s “determination to hold on to Donbass,” but forgets that Vanetsyan “did everything possible to hold on to Donbass” in 2020. On November 10, he proposed to transfer the whole of Artsakh, as well as its protected part to Azerbaijan. They forget that the protection of Shoushi was handed over to Artur Vanetsyan and Seyran Ohanyan, and the first of them left the front entrusted to him, the second came to Yerevan at a fateful moment for Shoushi to attend a memorial service…
But can they present the failure of Putin’s strategy as a victory?..
As far as I remember, this page was related to Vanetsyan. Now he is trying to save Russia’s face on the Ukrainian front and present an American plan (which is “no man’s land” for both sides) as a win-lose outcome in favor of Putin, what is wrong. Praises Putin’s “determination to hold on to Donbass,” but forgets that Vanetsyan “did everything possible to hold on to Donbass” in 2020. On November 10, he proposed to transfer the whole of Artsakh, as well as its protected part to Azerbaijan. They forget that the protection of Shoushi was handed over to Artur Vanetsyan and Seyran Ohanyan, and the first of them left the front entrusted to him, the second came to Yerevan at a fateful moment for Shoushi to attend a memorial service…
But can they present the failure of Putin’s strategy as a victory?..
